Bulletin Board # 57

Hello Tim,
Here are some news items from CNN's custom news site.
You can see them at:
http://customnews.cnn.com/cnews/pna.show_story?p_art_id=2521182&p_section_name=Sci-Tech I think we should be worried.
Mike


Cell Phone Knocks Out Nuclear Plant
A cellular phone is being blamed for the temporary shutdown of a nuclear power plant in Sweden. The Swedish newspaper Oesta Smaaland reported last week that the incident occurred at the nuclear plant in the southern town of Oskarshamn. Anders Joerle, an official with the state nuclear power inspection authority said, "We've experienced similar incidents in the U.S. where mobile phones have affected instruments inside nuclear power plants."

Programming Goof Nearly Causes Nuclear Accident

A computer glitch nearly caused an accident involving nuclear materials at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility helps develop safe handling and clean-up procedures for nuclear fuel, and is the only laboratory in the nation capable of creating critical or near-critical masses of nuclear materials. Officials said the incident occurred in February during an experiment where two cubes of uranium-235 are placed in close proximity to each other. A computer chip in the operator's joystick failed, causing the two cubes to move towards each other at ten times the normal speed. Other computers should have detected the joystick failure and halted the operation, but they didn't. An investigation following the incident found that a programmer had disabled critical fail-safe instructions two to three years ago during a switchover to a new computer system. Officials said the incident did not endanger workers or the public. Rick Anderson, leader of the lab's advanced nuclear technology group, said the errant programmer "was counseled."

(Personal note: I don't recall seeing a bright flash followed by a mushroom cloud so I assume they got the program debugged.)



I think I sent this out already, but better to be safe than sorry.

Tim
From: Tom Hollis
Subject: Russian Organized Crime / Drug Cartel / SIGINT Monitoring

I've been following the recent information on the Chinese threat to our national security as well as our industrial might. As an old navy SIGSEC operator I know how good these operator can be. I also know how easy most Americans make it for these collection operators. We were always briefing COMSEC and OPSEC to various commands. Industry needs to learn the lessons the military learned the hard way.

I've been out of the navy almost 10 years now and I'm amazed that I'm back doing threat briefings dealing with the same problems I did 10 years ago. Only now the bad guys are Russian Organized Crime and the Drug Cartel. Instead of briefing military commands I'm briefing the Federal Law Enforcement community. What really scares me is their attitudes, almost across the board they feel they can't be monitored, bugged or taped. Yet they put extreme emphasis on Title 3 operations (legal wiretaps) to put the bad guys away.

Anyway, I would like to ask you if you could solicit your network of friends and colleagues for any information that can be shared on Criminal SIGINT Monitoring. I've picked up rumors of U.S. Military trained personnel going to work for the Drug Cartels providing SIGINT against law enforcement operations. I've heard traffic analysis against secure networks has been provided to local drug organizations. As for the Russians it only makes sense to me that they would use SIGINT monitoring to further their goals. They certainly have enough highly trained personnel to draw upon.

Any information gained will be used to update the briefings I'm providing to various federal law enforcement agencies.

Thanks, keep up the good work!

Tom Hollis
COMSEC Manager
Executive Office for United States Attorneys

P.S. I enjoy all the jokes keep them comming. I've got a few to contribute, see the attached text files.

Catholic School Humor

Little Johnny is having a difficult time with math. He excels at history, social studies, art, language, and all the rest of the disciplines but can't get a handle on math. His parents hire tutors, and buy him specialized books and math CD Roms all to no avail. Finally, they have no choice. They have to find a solution to Little Johnny's math problem or he will never pass.

His parents decide to send him to a Catholic school known for it's strict academics. He goes to his first day of school all dressed in a freshly pressed white shirt and tie with black pants-very sharp. He comes home from school that afternoon and proceeds straight to his room. His parents do not see or hear from him until supper. At which time, he emerges from his room, math books strewn all about, eats his dinner and returns to his studies without saying a word. This goes on for weeks.

Finally, he arrives home one day with his report card, drops it on the table and goes straight to his room. His parents are afraid to open it. Finally, mustering the courage, they gingerly open the envelope and in big bold is the letter "A" in math. They're ecstatic. They rush into Johnny's room and hug him. "What did it" they ask.

"Was it the teachers, the new books, the new school?"

Little Johnny says, "Well, when I walked into the lobby of the new school that first day and saw that guy they'd nailed to that plus sign, I knew they were serious."

A little humor...



You all probably already know that I'm a Mac user (as versus a PC operator) and thought you might be interested in this.

It is just for information purposes, only (but if you do decidse to buy a multi million dollar system, tell them I sent you even if I didn't. I'll split anything I get). :>)

BTW, Kevin is a Mac user, as well.

tim



From: "Kevin D. Murray"
Subject: Movin' On Up... Think Different.

FYI,
http://www.techweb.com/wire/apple/mactales.html
Kevin D. Murray CPP, CFE, CCO, BCFE
Murray Associates
Counterespionage Consultants to Business & Government
Specialists in Electronic Eavesdropping Detection
908-832-7900 /

Movin' On Up
(04/23/98; 7:30 p.m. EST)
OPINION
By Randy Whitted, TechWeb contributor

Ignore the Wintel hype. Something real is going on that transcends the perceived status quo. In smaller businesses -- where most real work is done anyway -- company after company is bucking the PC trend, either by beefing up its Mac presence or switching over altogether.

MacCentral has managed to tap into this underground uprising, discovering several companies and international organizations such as the Swiss Army doing forward migrations from PCs to PowerMacs. The stories are lining up day after day about medium-sized corporations that are fed up with PC maintenance costs, loudmouth Mac evangelists who have succeeded in showing their bosses that Macs work better, and small-business owners who have discovered this inexpensive and reliable tool.

Inexpensive? Did I say inexpensive? Seems strange in the day of the $2,000 400-MHz Pentium II system to call a Mac inexpensive, but that's just the point. What can you expect from a 400-MHz Pentium II? Joe Jensen, a small-business owner, knows firsthand -- and won't be going down that road anymore.

A PC environment can be mutually rewarding for a desktop-support division -- a Mac network would configure them right out of a job.

His two new PowerMac 6500s "have been a dream come true," he says. "No more lost weekends, time away from my family, like I used to be forced into when the Intel systems used to drive me nuts with conflicts, errors, crashes, and restorations that used to take 16 to 20 hours, even when I was backed up. These Macs have been so terrific they have actually not only paid for themselves several times over, but my quality of life has improved."

Small businesses like Jensen's have found while Macs cost more initially, they are better long-term solutions. In addition, there are tons of cool shareware utilities and enhancements to add, network functions are easy to tamper with, and the openness of the file system allows for some rather funky organizational schemes.

But this scenario doesn't bode well for larger corporations, which typically have adopted PCs. After all, if you put the same prohibitive operating system on each machine with the same software, you have no tampering and no problems. A support staff can handle larger volumes of impersonal work stations that all look and work the same, right?

Well, not quite. This cookie-cutter failsafe doesn't always work. My friend, a desktop-support person, says his company's Windows 95 systems come down left and right, despite their generic configurations. And why shouldn't they? If you were in desktop support, would you want reliable machines? To a degree, yes, but not too reliable. A PC environment can be mutually rewarding for a desktop-support division -- a Mac network would configure them right out of a job.

Thus, the Mac migration in small businesses that don't have the resources for dedicated support -- and don't need really need it with the Mac. Less time troubleshooting means more work done, and as Steve Jobs said at Seybold recently, "more time to spend with the family."

If you're part of a small- or medium-sized company, check out MacCentral's Forward Migration page before you make any more computer investments. And consider Windows Magazine's list of top 10 best-selling Windows business titles. Better yet, let me summarize them for you. No.1: Windows 95 upgrade. No. 2-8: three anti-virus apps, two uninstallers, and two crash recovery/prevention programs.

Because if the Swiss Army uses Macs, you can bet it's not because of its built-in combination CD-ROM/cup holder. www.techweb.com

Randy Whitted is a Web producer at EDTN, a CMPnet website. Previous Tales From The Mac Side: